Monday, May 29, 2017

This is a course I taught to lawyers.  If there is significant interest, I will revise and turn it into some form of manuscript for people to read and study.  I have a CD that went with the course.


COURSE OUTLINE
Surviving a Criminal Practice in a
Postmodern Age

Dennis L. Blewitt


INTRODUCTION
  1. Introduce instructor, course materials, procedures, etc
  2. Introduce participants
    1. POV
    2. Influences views
    3. Causes understanding of interpretations
  3. Discuss readings, assignments, discussions.
    1. Like Inns of Court
    2. May have guests
    3. Emphasis

  1. Books
    1. Criminal Justice Through the Ages, by Medieval Crime Museum, Vol IV(b) Forsberg, Rothenberg o.d.T, 1993
      1. From Rothenberg Crime Museum
      2. Court orders form time of Charlemagne
      3. Saxonspeil
      4. Norman and Roman Law
      5. Rights of peasants
      6. Equivalent of const
      7. Torture devices
    2. Barbarism To Jury Justin Fleming, Harper Collins, Aukland, 1994
      1. British Barrister
      2. History of development of common law
      3. Africa, US , India, Pacific, Australia and New Zeland
    1. Perpetual Prison Machine
      1. Good statistical survey
      2. Emphasis on Media
      3. Explains politics
      4. Introduction to postmodern thought in Political system
    1. Discipline and Punish
a, French school
      1. Reviews punishment in Civil Law countries
      2. Age of Surveillance
      3. Basis of Continental penology
Lecture on Historical Development
  1. From Roman times
  2. Development of crime and punishment
  3. Views of crime
  4. Remedies
  5. Idea of sovereignty
  6. Discussion

  7. Magna Carta
  8. Materials
    1. List from CD
    2. Open History folder and read for next time with 1st book
    3. Assign discussion participants
Close at 10

WEEK TWO

  1. Discussion of materials
    1. Hammurabi
    2. Magna Charta
    3. Rights of Man
    4. Law of Wm
    5. Rights of Man
    6. Colonial rights
      1. Freeman
      2. Duties
      3. Weapon
      4. Corp structure
      5. Puritanism
  1. Constitution
    1. Drafting
    2. Bill of Rights
    3. Contrast with Crim Justice
    4. Compare with Crim Justice
    5. Contrast with Jury
    6. Compare with Jury
III Discussion
  1. Why history
  2. Why develop
  3. Why compare and contrast
  4. Philosophical basis
IV Modern era
    1. Industrial Revolution
      1. Why
      2. Movements afoot
      3. Themes
        1. Slavery, serfdom and status
        2. Emancipation
        3. Developing Sovereignty
        4. Religion and the Church
        5. Predatory behavior
        6. Forming Groups
          1. Rights
          2. Obligations Inherited
          3. Geography
          4. Cities and States

          5. Concept of State
          6. Corporation
        7. Hierarchy
          1. Inherited
          2. Challenged
          3. Important in French and German school
    1. Folder on policy prior to 1848
    2. Liberties of Englishmen
    3. Ohrmey Origin of State
V Discussion

WEEK   THREE
  1. Review
  2. German and French folder
    1. German School
      1. AKA Frankford School
        1. Hitler ascending
        2. Mostly Jewish
        3. Pessimistic
        4. Contrast with Weber
          1. After Weber
          2. Weber WWI
          3. Started discussion on Political entity and bureaucracy
          4. Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
            1. Practice capitalism like religion
            2. Puritanism
              1. Values of puritans caused development
              2. Tocqueville
              3. Predestination
              4. Can redeem through work, straight, etc.
              5. God rewards good and punishes bad
              6. Welfare recipients bad
    1. French School
      1. Marcuse
      2. Boudriard
      3. Eccho (Italian)
      4. Sartre
      5. Particularly concerned with culture and its transmission
      6. Write your own history
      7. Step on own shadow
      8. Technology influences
    1. Affected American thought in 70's and 80's
      1. Mc Cluhan
      2. Chomsky
III Today
  1. Z magazine
  2. Dot com
  3. Impact on internet

  4. Bowling Alone
  5. Eleanor Rigby
  6. Lonely Crowd
IV Introduction to Capitalism
V Introduction to Social Capital
VI Theory of Change
VII Conflict Study
VIII Discussion

WEEK   FOUR

  1. Critical Theory
    1. Habermas
      1. Between schools
      2. Now with German Govmt
      3. Some optimism unlike French and German Schools
II Review and Discuss
III Introduce Culture and Cultural Studies
    1. Different from Sociology
    2. Media theory
      1. Mc Cluhan
      2. Media is the message
      3. Discuss Perpetual Prison Machine
IV Review and relate
V Evaluate course and feedback


WEEK   FIVE

Thursday, May 4, 2017

IS MURDER OF THE CITIZENRY BY THE POLICE A RESULT OF COR PORATE TAKEOVER OF EDUCATION AND LOSS OF LOCAL CONTROL II?
            As I reflect over my career, I have tried to make sense out of all the changes I’ve seen over 4 decades. I failed. Although, having drifted in and out of the academic arena over the years and having tried cases in multiple jurisdictions both state and federal, I’ve made some observations from which I can make some conclusions. In an earlier comment, I described the situation wherein a knife wielding student was murdered by police, who claimed they feared for their life or safety. This is a typical excuse of a police officer when he murders somebody. Of course, such an incident is generally reviewed by a prosecutor who inevidently concludes that the police officer was following his training and, therefore, did nothing wrong.  I can’t help but wonder who the hell are training these killers. Police officers I’ve known for four decades take pride in the fact that they never drew their guns. When I first started practicing law the prison population was approximately 10% of what it is today. And at that time and there was an uneasiness and undertow of rebellion in United States with racial tension, antiwar protest, and unruly hippies rebelling against their parents and society.
 I think that one of the many causal factors is that of linguistic programming or semiotics. I will begin by commenting on the concept of a criminal prosecution. Criminal prosecutions for centuries dealt with the relationship between a citizen and as sovereign or state. Individuals had nothing to do with the process, they could of course sue if they were injured.  Most prosecutors, even in large cities like Chicago, had private practices and dealt with a wide experience of circumstances and people while prosecuting. The broader the experience of the prosecutor, the greater the range of discretion used in the process and the perception of their role as maintaining or promoting the best interest of society. Now, professional prosecutors whose sole purpose is to get convictions have replaced them.  The modern prosecutor typically has no outside experience and is not taught to think in terms of societal interests, but in narrow terms of whether or not there was a violation of law which can yield a conviction. This has not been healthy. It is particularly harmful, since most prosecutions over the last four decades have been based upon enforcement of drug laws which were invented by a president and his staff to target groups, such as anti-war protesters, and other young people such as hippies thought of as political enemies.
For that to view of reality to succeed, there had to be a great propaganda effort by the government to change perception and get support for a policy not based on science or to wage a war not declared by Congress as the Constitution dictated, but designed to instill fear.  With the Nixon administration, a new fear-based construction of reality was created, calculated to control citizens and make them docile.
By changing the construct of the word, our concept of justice was altered. When I started practicing law, anyone who stated that he defendant pleaded innocent was deemed to be an ignoramus. Anyone with a 9th grade civics class knew that a criminal trial was about whether or not the government had shown whether it had the right to interfere with the person's life liberty or property. Innocence had nothing to do with the matter.  I noticed over time that reporters and commentators, when reporting on an appearance in court by an accused, would report that the accused pleaded innocent. There is no such plea, nor was there ever such a plea. But after hearing term used by the press repeatedly, the expectation of the public changed.  The public now expects that an accused should show that he’s innocent in some manner. If the accused didn’t explain, the perception was that he had escaped Justice, because Justice and punishment were now synonymous.  Changing that one word caused ramifications that we are witnessing today.  Since people who are been arrested have not shown innocence and typically plea bargain, the Public feels cheated or believes the system is corrupt. Otherwise whilst with the guilty sums of bitches walk?
Politically savvy district attorneys don’t bother correcting the press, because the misuse of the term helps them win cases and get votes.  They don’t view their job as looking out for the best interest of society but, like the Inquisitors of foreign jurisdictions, extorting confessions or admissions to justify punishment.  After a few decades of failed expectations, and no officials, or anyone else for that matter bothering to correct the perception, the public’s view of the court system is one of incompetence, corruption, or dysfunction.
This Perception been reinforced by the propaganda of the police, who belly-ache about arrestees being released on bond. I have been compelled to believe this is deliberate or intentional. Most police that I’ve met are intelligent and don’t display that type of ignorance. However, the party line of the police is “we worked hard to catch criminals and keep the streets safe, and the court lets them go after their arrest.” That leads the public to conclude that an arrest should be the end of it. And if a person is released, the public is un protected. Only an idiot could believe that this is actually what should occur. They’ve been trained that there is a presumption of innocence. They have been trained that defendants have a right to bond. They have been trained that a person isn’t a criminal until tried by a jury or judge or pleading guilty in front of a court.  They ignore these inconvenient facts to propagandize and deliberately miss-state things, blaming the Constitution for endangering the public. So, everything after arrest is viewed as inefficient pandering of criminals or worse.  Even worse, it leaves the public with the wrong conclusions and misperceptions about our justice system.
So, after a few decades of misperception, this information and conscious propaganda, we have now been sent well on the way to a police state. To placate the public’s perception of criminals escaping Justice, incarceration has increased tenfold over the last four decades. Even though some attempts have been made to change that statistic, no attempt has been made to rectify the underlying perception problem. So, like the Mafia, the government continues to sell protection to its citizens from problems or threats created by the government itself.  They also ferment change and undermining of our common-law traditions and protections.  We have become the enemy to the police who are now at war with us.  Who benefits?
When I started practicing law there were no private prisons. There were no privatized pretrial services because the purpose of the bail was just a guarantee one’s appearance at court. There was still a presumption of innocence, so the courts couldn’t take jurisdiction until it improved guilt in some manner. However, fearful or ignorant judges, generally trained as prosecutors blithely proceed, ignoring ten centuries of precedent regarding bond making illegal conditions a condition of bond to support a new industry of privatized pretrial services. This serves as a double why me to the poor of our country, but then, as a “famous line from the movie “Magnificent Seven” stated “if God had not intended them to be sheared he wouldn’t have made them sheep,” referring to the peasants who got periodically raped, pillaged and plundered.

A police state can only exist when there are no constitutional restraints or the flagrant violation of such rights, backed by an ignorant public.  Our Constitutional form of government and our social framework are being deliberately altered or destroyed.  Fear is destroying our tradition of fairness and justice.  Police, pandering to that fear, do the will of the elite against the people changing a police force system that should protect its citizens into an occupation army.

Thursday, April 6, 2017

TIME MARCHES BACKWARD.  WELCOME TO THE 19TH CENTURY
FORWARD TO THE PAST
Text Box: 1Dennis L Blewitt, J.D. as a young attorney
The marijuana industry promotors have gone into shock since the change of administration.  After all the years hoping, wishing, praying, and civil disobedience, a sizeable section of the population celebrated because they believed that the country had finally come to its senses.  There was a convergence between the academic world and the “real” one.  Over most of their adult lives, Viet Nam vets have lived with what they believed were insane drug laws.  Having served their country and learned about weed in Asia, there was a sense of betrayal when they returned to persecution and prosecution.  They knew that the drug war was bull shit, but many saw veteran benefits and other expectations dashed because of the drug war.  The freedom that they thought for was turned into something else. It couldn’t be described, but it was definitely felt.  They sat by and watched as their free world was privatized, inflation set in, the United States went into a state of perpetual war which they could not understand.
Prisons filled, prosecutions increased in the face of lowering crime rates. Drug laws wrecked citizens and polarized society.  Inflation robbed them of their savings and education was limited unless an inordinate amount of debt was taken on.  They returned from a war in which they thought they were fighting for freedom to an emerging police state.  It took a few decades for them to realize that they were screwed.  Middle class shrunk and wealth was being redistributed.  No longer were trades sponsoring apprentice programs.  The trade schools had been privatized.  Pensions were robbed and union funds decimated.  There were no more retirement plans, no longevity, no reward for loyalty. All this was done in light of evidence to the contrary.
However, there was one glimmer of hope.  The thing that started all the repression and punishment binge.  Civil service ranks were thinned as privatization took over, but then one day, a Nixon politician, released from jail and having several decades to reflect, told the people that the whole drug war was a scam to stop civil rights and pacifist movements.  It had nothing to do with crime.  It had to do with fear and political power.  But it also stirred up turmoil and divisiveness in society.  The divisiveness was lessoning and after four decades of debate, governments were taking a look at the repressive drug laws.  Several states legalized and the sky didn’t fall.  Those states thrived and there were no noticeable adverse effects.  However, the celebration was premature.
The country hadn’t come to its senses.  The same prejudice was there.  Bigotry thrived.  Reality became denied and folk wisdom and fantasy took over.  People didn’t want facts, they wanted justification.  We became divided.  Reality became irrelevant.  Beliefs were important, not ideas, logic, or facts.  The public had been conditioned to associate marijuana with evil.  Therefore, the reality didn’t matter.  If someone believed it was bad, that person was not about to be confused with facts or reality.  The world became one of them and us.  The good and the bad.  Bad had to be stopped, even if it were good.  War was peace.  We elected a person to be president, not based upon capability of position, but because he appealed to the confused, frustrated, angry masses, who didn’t care about facts or truth.  He has appointed cronies to positions of power, chosen to please his constituency, not for capability. 
All the appointments had a worldview thing in common.  They were selfish, and believed they were good.  They were judgmental and everyone who was not in agreement with them was bad.  The world was evil, populated by unworthy ruffians.  Control over the people was mandatory.  And, since it was mandatory, it might as well be profitable.  These people were the guardians of our society and deserved to be made rich.  The selfish rich won and the masses were about to get screwed, with no institutions or people between them and the predators. 
To maintain control, the predators need money to buy robo-police and public relations.  The last thing they want is for the population to wise up.  Their solution for that is privatization of schools.  And after the society is bled of all its assets, there will have to be tight control.  There is one way that police and intelligence agencies have always obtained funding.  That is through the confiscation laws These funds are not regulated, but are the police’s private slush fund.  With outside money, they can’t be controlled.  And the best source of unaccounted money is through the confiscation of property through seizures in drug enforcement actions.  Since marijuana is the only drug that has an odor, it is necessary to the shakedown of the citizenry.  That is why the police state is going to fight tooth and nail against any legalization or decriminalization.  Below is an article I wrote quite some time ago.  It is still valid.
I wrote this a few years ago.  It still applies.
 Why Marijuana Won’t be Legalized.
It is essential to the Police shake down
          It has been over four decades since I took my first graduate course in criminology.  Not much has changed since then, except that findings accepted by social scientists have been denied by people in power who find the science inconvenient.  The biggest change is the increase the in ignorance of the general population, followed by the corruption of the government.  Only a village idiot could have studied the drug situation and still believed in the gateway drug theory as expounded by BNDD director, Henry J. Anslinger, propagandist extraordinary.  He maintained that because most heroin addicts stated they smoked marijuana first, it was a gateway drug to addiction.  He persisted in his fictitious version of reefer madness into the sixties, pushing his toxic bull shit to the newly formed Drug Enforcement Agency, who for political rather than logical or factual reasons bought it lock, stock and barrel.  Restated, the public is conned into believing that heroin can be controlled by arresting pot offenders.
          The theory goes something like this, and I recall from four decades ago.  95% of all heroin addicts stated that they tried marijuana before becoming addicted.  Therefore, marijuana is the gateway drug to heroin addiction, which causes your daughters to enter prostitution to support their habit.   One could also state that 100% of all heroin addicts breathed before taking heroin.  Or, one could say that every biker gang member started out on bicycles.  The logic is about the same.  There is no assertion of causality, but it plays well to the PTA, Lions, Legionnaires, MADD and other cheerleaders for the lies and fear-mongering of the power structure to subjugate the people and keep them policed.  
          The gateway theory has been cited by “experts” who obviously failed logic but passed rhetoric and are intellectually challenged.  Additionally, the demonization of the gateway product is in full force, blaming marijuana on auto accidents, pregnancies, sterility, stupidity and all other kinds of ailments.  It has become a key ingredient in the Theocrats’ attack on science.  Image and message trumps science.  Superstition, prejudice and ignorance trumps science.  Science is demonic, ungodly, heathen and bad for the country (at least the 1 per-centers).  Over the decades, theory and study of crime causality has taken a back seat to punitive measures and mass incarceration.  The country has become statistically challenged.
          When I first studied criminology many decades ago, the concerns were organized crime, price fixing by the big electrical companies of hydroelectric generators, extortion, robbery, murder, predatory behavior of the con-artists and the like.  I spent hours poring over the records of the McClellan and Kefauver committees. I studied causality of crime, not paranoid dreamt up scenarios from someone’s imagination.  Greedy corporate executives had slightly higher status than garbage collectors and lawyers.  There was a movement to stop predatory practices of the corporations and have truth in lending for consumers.  The new Uniform Commercial Code was being adapted and there was change in the winds.  The people were not fair game for the rich and powerful.  The common person had some recourse and were protected by the law against exploitation.  Black people had a trial before they were lynched and some even got to vote and lived to tell about it.  There was a sense of community and cohesion.  Taverns and bars were looked at as community centers where consensus and opinion were created, not dens of evil.  The corporations answered this cohesion with well-funded diversions focusing union corruption and patriotism.
          Then came the civil unrest of the Nixon years and things changed.  The saying “give them an inch and they will take a mile” was the favorite saying of the radical whites in the country.  Civil rights were here, but the blacks weren’t satisfied.  They wanted more than rights.  They wanted equality.  When it didn’t come fast enough, the blacks got restless and rioted in some cities.  Of course, the disoriented nervous whites got anxious and even scared.  The Viet Nam war gearing up, which was not too popular.  The rulers were fearful of a public they could not control or manipulate.  TV showed Buddhists monks engaging in self-emoliation and Black Panthers brandishing assault rifles and bandoliers at the Reagan Capital in Sacramento.  Reagan walked around with a load in his pants that day.  Law and order became the mantra of the fearful and confused. This was code for “stop the blacks.”  And both races knew it.  So, after a spectacular convention in Chicago which decimated the Democrats, the Republicans elected Richard Nixon.
          The marijuana war intensified rather than gearing down.  The country became preoccupied with drugs, causing the US to have the highest incarceration rate in the world.  Although crime rates listed by the FBI remained somewhat static, incarcerations increased.  Law enforcement was becoming the “rogue elephant.” When Denver passed an ordinance making enforcement of Marijuana law the lowest of police priorities, marijuana arrests almost doubled the next year.  This isn’t the result of a few rogue elephants, it is a stampede, the result of institutionalized behavior.  The same phenomenon has been reported in New York.  President Obama promised drug law reform, yet the justice department is loudly protesting and waging fear campaigns on the marijuana users.  To the uninitiated, this seems confusing.  
          Why all the enforcement activity?  Doesn’t the government realize how much money in taxes the marijuana industry generates?  Why are they killing the goose laying the golden egg?  The Denver Post’s John Ingold reported $2.2 million in sales tax for marijuana tax revenue in November, 2010.  This was only for part of the year.  The Attorney General of Colorado responded that “...the new revenue stream doesn't change his opinion of dispensaries.”  (said through a spokesman)          The revenue stream from medicinal marijuana comes from fees charged dispensaries, care givers and patients and sales tax on the substance sold in dispensaries.  The tax revenues go mainly to cities and the state to fund their projects.  The fees go to the Department of Revenue.  So, with that kind of revenue, “why are the cops whining”, ask the naive and innocent?
          I ask in return, “Didn’t you see the videos of the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York, Las Angeles, Oakland and Berkeley?  If not go look at them.  Look at the police.  Look at their equipment.  They are all dressed in expensive riot gear.”  That shit costs money.  Compare this with the dress of the Chicago Police at the 1968 Democratic convention.  The difference in equipment is due to the drug war. The money comes from the drug war budget, which is bloated by confiscations and forfeitures.  With legalization, the cops are left out, and the gravy train grinds to a halt.  Instead the proceeds are going to such things as roads, schools, health care, assistance to poor and disabled, and infra structure, things that used to be a priority before the advent of the police state.  Additionally, the corruption J. Edgar Hoover referred to when he forbade FBI agents to engage in drug enforcement, would cease.  Cops would afford fewer donuts, planes and condominiums.
          For years, I believed that the police were ignorant dunderheads.  They followed orders like good martinets and did not question things.  They were true believers, not confused by facts or evidence.  Concepts such as fairness, justice, due process and the Constitution were for bleeding hearts.  They would not let ideology or justice interfere with their duty.  These simple people believed they were just doing their jobs.  They would blindly follow, because they were brainwashed.  Then, I conquered my prejudice and ignorance.  Cops actually were not stupid.  Most detectives had attended college.  How then, could they then ignore all the reports and recommendations of experts since the Eisenhower report in the ‘50's?  Some were unaware of existence of reports. Some didn’t care, because they believed in what they were doing.  And, some were just sadistic bastards, drunk with power fueled by their bigotry and ignorance.  And, some were in it for the money.  
I started examining the curriculum of the courses offered police.  I didn’t expect them to have the same education as I for many reasons.  However, most colleges or universities teach the same facts, discuss the same research and theories.  Then, a friend in the political science department provided me with some government publications regarding grants and research proposals.  None of the grants dealt with causality.  They dealt with mechanics of arrest, trial and confinement.  Some dealt with procedures that streamlined the assembly line to incarcerate more persons efficiently.  Management by objective ruled and political policies were geared toward punishment and revenge.  Police action was calculated to make the public feel good or secure, not to be effective.  Image was everything.  There was always enough fear from the police to insure generous budgets.  This worked like the mafia protection racket.  Theoretical criminology was ignored.  It was inconvenient and contradicted what the politicians wanted.  The criminal justice area was almost void of any intellectual content.  If the students aren’t taught anything, they can’t be expected to act intelligently.  They also don’t rock the boat and agitate for change.  Causality didn’t matter, only public perception of protection counted.   Image was all.
          There is also a more insidious side to the drug war policy.   Several would be cops joined vice and narcotics to get rich.  The opportunity for bribes and extra money is almost boundless.  Additionally, oversight was sloppy or negligible.  I was involved in several cases where the evidence confiscated from the defendants ended back into the market place, placed there by police or Government.  Courts and prosecutors turned a blind eye to the evidence of corruption.  If that weren’t enough, the police state became self-funding through fines and forfeitures, perpetuating corruption on a massive scale.  Crime enforcement has become the new aphrodisiac for the perverts and bullies.  Several abuse cases have been reported such as the broom handle rape in New York, the killing of arrestees, and other atrocities that may or may not have made the papers.  Instead of constraints, sanctions and oversight, things are concealed or covered up.  Judges, coming from the police establishment conspire with the officers and prosecutors to encourage perjury, sadism and other misconduct, imbued with a belief that the ends justify the means.  They identify with the imaginary problems of the police in following the rules, which might result in a less than desired result.  Judges don’t view their purpose as protecting the citizenry.  They believe they should expedite convictions to help fill the jails, and reward their police constituency.  The Constitution is no longer the law of the land, but an impediment to efficient enforcement of assembly line justice, where any judge can rationalize ignoring the citizens for the sake of exigency.  Get the guilty has replaced the idea of protecting the innocent.  We have a post-legal society.
          Presently, close to 75 % of drug arrests are for marijuana1.  It is an easily identifiable commodity with a distinct smell, look, and fan base.  As long as the police and public buy in to the gateway fiction, the police can justify their budgets by claiming they are preventing heroin addiction by enforcing the draconian marijuana laws.  They are protecting the public with the crusade against marijuana.  Not so.  They are perpetuating a bureaucracy.  They are protecting their status and budgets.  
          Drug enforcement policy has nothing to do with protecting the public, preventing harm to the youth, and other bullshit reasons given for the drug war by the cynical enforcement cabal.  Instead, it has everything to do with money.  Look how the additional funding for police enforcement is utilized.  It is used for surveillance and riot equipment and other means of repression, not to solve crime.  Marijuana arrests justify the drug budget.  Heroin and cocaine are hard to detect and therefore the case numbers won’t justify the budget.  But as long as we have a fearful population and lying, corrupt police and officials, we will have marijuana prohibition to perpetuate the fiction of good policing.  The officials know better.  They aren’t stupid (no matter how hard they try to look that way).  They want to control us in order to be able to exploit us.  That is why they now are proposing domestic surveillance drones.  Fear equates to greater budgets and more toys.
          It is time for the citizenry to wake up and smell the weeds.  They are in the police agencies and greedy politicians, fed by greedy corporate predators.  They are perpetuating a fearful society.  They are destroying the societal fabric with suspicion and jealousy and no end is in sight.  They are relying on ignorance and lack of interest.  They count on a docile population, just as a King of France and his wife Marie once did.  It is time for the people to be heard.  It is time for dialogue and discussion.  It is time for action.  You can’t fool all the people all the time!  (Hopefully).  We have to make officials and politicians know that we want safe roads, bridges, water, hospitals, sanitation and the rest of the infrastructure.  Show them we value education over incarceration.  We want to lead the world in freedom, not in repression and incarceration.  We were a democratic republic, not a totalitarian police state.  Show them we no longer tremble in fear of your imaginary bogey man.  It is time they fear us–the people, not the press and public relations consultants.  Start writing your council, legislature, commissioner, governor, congress, senate and president.  Let them hear people rather than money.  If they don’t listen, shun them.  Embarrass them, berate them and expose their greed and ignorance to others.  Stand up and be counted.  Destroy a prison, build a bridge.  Be courageous.  Be free.
1 Of those charged with marijuana violations, approximately 88 percent (758,593 Americans) were charged with possession only. The remaining 99,815 individuals were charged with “sale/manufacture,” a category that includes virtually all cultivation offenses. Crime in America: FBI Uniform Crime Reports 2008 (Washington, DC: US Dept. of Justice, 2008),
Incarceration in the United States is one of the main forms of punishment and/or rehabilitation for the commission of felony and other offenses. The United States has the highest documented incarceration rate in the world. At year-end 2009 it was 743 adults incarcerated per 100,000 population

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) 2,266,800 adults were incarcerated in U.S. federal and state prisons, and county jails at year-end 2010 — about 7% of adults in the U.S. resident population. [5] Additionally, 4,933,667 adults at year-end 2009 were on probation or on parole. [4] In total, 7,225,800 adults were under correctional supervision (probation, parole, jail, or prison) in 2009 — about 3.1% of adults in the U.S. resident population.

Sunday, March 26, 2017

ALIEN INVASION WHITE HOUSE SURRENDERS

WE HAVE BEEN INVADED BY ALIENS.  CONDUCT OF THE Government is foreign, fear reigns.  Dlblewitt, J.D. April, 2017
          I watched incredulously as the scene unfolds since the Presidential election.  I have studied politics, I have advised politicians, I have even run for office.  I tried to explain my observations in terms of post-modern social theory, and reread Foucault, Eco and the others.  Under the guise of post modernism, the real situation is starting to be seen, and it isn’t pleasant.
            It is exactly like depicted in “The Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” a 1958 sci-fi movie about alien pods hatching in to humans, replacing the real humans, only without emotion and feelings.  A local doctor notices the strangeness in his patients and uncovers the danger.  The film ends with the doctor leaving town, passed by trucks containing pods.  The infiltration was so smooth, it wasn’t noticed by the population, and upon replacement, it didn’t matter.
            I will refer to the current invaders as the “Pus**snatchers,” in honor of the President, who made the term acceptable to middle-class, middle-aged women who made fools out of themselves, adoring a crude, crass, monster after feigning outrage at a Black man in the White House succeeding at governance. 
            It wasn’t obvious until recently that we were invaded.  The aliens, walked among us, talked and interacted with us, and showed no discernable differences, except that they had no emotions or empathy for humans, who just assumed that they were just snobbish rich assholes.  But they can no longer hide their identities nor their intention of taking over the world to pillage and plunder.
            They were exposed by speaking a foreign language, disguised as English.  However, their words became twisted and miscommunicated.  Rather than truth and observation, there were “alternate facts.”   Lies were blatant and not even retracted.  It didn’t matter because, the aliens were connected to the master pod.  Non-pods were irrelevant.  The media was attacked as an enemy of the people (non-aliens).  They ignored rules of protocol.  They filled posts with unemotional robots from the pods, seeded in the country.  They thought that the people would not notice their disdain for humans or humanity.  Since the aliens were all interconnected, they could not function if a plan were foiled.  The replacement humans always followed and all were in agreement.  The master pod controlled because he was the master pod, not because he was capable of doing so.

            When the aliens came out, they attacked the humans mercilessly, deriding their institutions, sowing distrust and envy.  They applied shock doctrine, but did so to such an extreme that it was counterproductive.  THEY ARE HERE!  THEY ARE AMONG US!  THERE IS DANGER!  HELP!

Friday, March 24, 2017

PRIVATIZATION PLAGUE: 4/20, THE BIG LIE, EDUCATION, AND INDOCTRINATION

DENNIS L. BLEWITT, J.D., march, 2017
For quite some time, people have been concerned about events on 4/20. There has been controversy, misdirection, propaganda, panic, and arrest.  At all started years ago by taking a cue from Rosa Parks, the black lady who refused to go to the back of the segregated bus and started a movement.  In 1971 an event was planned regarding marijuana on April 20.  It was to protest the insanity of the drug laws.  Some lawyers, such as myself announced that we would not take marijuana cases because there was a minimum mandatory sentencing. The significance of that date morphed after 4 decades to be synonymous with smoking marijuana. For quite some time now, marijuana was smoked openly in various parts of the country in protest of the marijuana laws. The main area of contention seems to be that marijuana possession or use is categorized the same as heroin possession or use. In categorizing as such, the government didn’t follow its own legislative plan or definitions.  University’s used to be a place where information was exchanged and ideas were freely marketed. Now the free marketing of ideas, and indeed educating students has taken a backseat to image and advancing propaganda, falsities, fantasies and wet dreams to obtain private sector money to be used to brainwash students. 
For years, the University administration has tried to ignore the Constitutional right to assembly and free speech in an effort to protect the manufactured image of the Univ. of Colorado as a learning institution. The University of Colorado at one point even offered a $50 reward to any student who could identify any fellow student smoking marijuana at the event.  It is ironic that the medieval concept of sanctuary has been replaced by a concept of strict compliance with rules for the sake of money.  That is antithical to intellectual freedom.  Marijuana legislation was sponsored specifically with the intent of punishing student protest or right to assembly guaranteed by the Constitutional form or government that people drawing a public paycheck have been sworn to protect.  However, the worshippers of the false idol named privatization, don’t believe it should apply to others that don’t think as they do.  Their false God preaches that lying, cheating and stealing is ok if it supports “free enterprise” and a distorted view of Christianity.  Real Christians were thrown to the lions by people like this.  These Christians are similar to ones referred by Max Weber when he wrote “Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism.”
This year, the institutional hypocrisy and blatant disregard for principles of either education or constitution from the ethically challenged University of Colorado attacks any non-Fascist interested in truth, justice, freedom, or the Constitution. After several decades, members of the Nixon administration finally disclosed that the drug war was manufactured, not to prevent drug abuse or crime, but to control political dissidents protesting the war in Vietnam or minority citizens protesting for civil rights. The price of education appears to be the price of free thought and knowledge.
Think of the irony. Students are put in a position where they must incur great debt to go to a school that doesn’t teach them, but indoctrinates them, instilling fear and frustration so that they will not assert themselves in the future. Students are taught that truth doesn’t matter. Knowledge doesn’t matter. Science doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is following orders and not pissing off the masters. The tragedy is that many of the faculty and the courts agree with this position.
When I first started my undergraduate career, faculty members were required to sign a loyalty oath to keep their jobs. Sen. McCarthy was entertaining the ignorant while the assertions about the danger of communism are leveled against dissent.   We were subjected to fear. We were bombarded with propaganda. We had fire drills. We had atomic bomb blast drills. We had nerve gas drills. We lived in constant fear of destruction by thermal nuclear war. So, what did we do about it? Some of us became beatniks, stoically facing the possibility of annihilation while hanging out in coffee houses, spouting poetry and singing fork songs. Later, some became hippies, bringing forth the age of Aquarius, with the rewards of drugs, sex, and rock and roll. Many of us looked inward toward improving ourselves and our country, with the resulting civil rights and antiwar movements. Since the Russians had sent up a satellite into space, and we hadn’t, money was spent on educating this citizenry rather than exploiting them. Higher education was virtually free. The masters discovered their mistake when they tried to convince the product of this education to go to war killing anything labeled as a Communist, while supporting a reactionary government in SE Asia. So, education became a marketed product, meant to be consumed.  Students became commodities and consumers.  Learning became secondary or coincidental and may or may not happen.  The commodity was structured to dumb down students, bleed money from the consumers and market product.
The result was that potential protesters were saddled with enormous debt to get an education which may or may not be useful to them in the future. A class war was started with the haves preying on the have nots. Consumer protection was repealed. A cohesive society was splintered into factions. Marijuana was demonized as the cause of many of our problems. Consequently, prisons rather than schools were built. Roads and bridges were left to deteriorate. Selfishness was rewarded. Punishment of offenders was based upon the offender’s ability to lie about others. We became a nation of jealous snitches, convinced that individuals were the only thing that mattered, and poverty and misfortune were character flaws instead of systemic flaws. This citizenry became irrational and crazy.  Hypocrisy reigned supreme. Behavior by leaders which outrage the rest of the world was excepted and cheered.
So, instead of being able to rely upon scholars, intellectuals, and educators to promote sanity and justice, they subject the people to punishment and sanction if a government position based upon fear and fiction is not accepted by the public.  Like the emperor’s new clothes, 4/20 recognition is viewed as a threat to image, imperiling money raising activities of the university because the business contributors are ignorant bigots who do not respect education or critical thinking, expecting conformity and acquiescence.  4/20 isn’t about marijuana.  IT is about freedom, integrity in government and freedom from propaganda.  A rally on 4/20 is a rally against Fascism.  The assembly of students at the University is not about marijuana, it is about justice and the appointment of a Neo-Nazi as attorney general of the United States.  That is why it was called a protest.  The administration cynically labeled it as a “pot party” insulting the student-consumers at the university and contemptuously disregarding even paying lip service to any state or federal Constitutions.  This climate produced by “academic” institutions is contrary to centuries old tradition. It shows why the electorate has been deadlocked and has elected a criminal traitor as president, surrounding himself with greedy rich people who are put in positions to destroy our institutions.  It is time for the people leading institutions to respond to the people.  It is time to resist idiots preying upon us while disenfranchising us.  It is time to put educators in charge of educational institutions, not glad-handing prostitutes sucking money out of rich contributors.  The Chancellor who doesn’t understand what a university really is should be put in charge of refuse collection or scheduling transportation, not pretending to be an academic.  It is time for the students to organize and get with it while there is a semblance of intellectual freedom in out institution of higher learning, at least to where it was in 12th Century England or France.  Fight corporate greed and revise and protect our sacred institution